Sign in
This is a demo organisation with sample data. Explore freely: your own organisation is untouched.
97.6% Estate trust
  • Chosen values carry 99.0% confidence on average, across 125 fields.
  • Sources disagree on 5 of them (4.0%), costing 1.4 points at 0.35 per percent.
What the score rests on
Fields observed 125
Fields in conflict 5
Identity reviews 0
Contributing sources 4
Trust by domain

Evidence quality

Identity 300 observations · 0 fields in conflict
99.0%
How this is worked out
  • Chosen values carry 99.0% confidence on average, across 75 fields.
  • Every source agrees, so nothing is deducted.
Location 100 observations · 3 fields in conflict
94.8%
How this is worked out
  • Chosen values carry 99.0% confidence on average, across 25 fields.
  • Sources disagree on 3 of them (12.0%), costing 4.2 points at 0.35 per percent.
Ownership 100 observations · 2 fields in conflict
96.2%
How this is worked out
  • Chosen values carry 99.0% confidence on average, across 25 fields.
  • Sources disagree on 2 of them (8.0%), costing 2.8 points at 0.35 per percent.
Financial 0 observations · 0 fields in conflict
No evidence
How this is worked out
  • No source has reported on these fields yet, so there is nothing to base trust on.
Lifecycle 0 observations · 0 fields in conflict
No evidence
How this is worked out
  • No source has reported on these fields yet, so there is nothing to base trust on.
Trust policy

Evidence, not overwrite

Assetory keeps every source observation. For each field it chooses the value with the highest confidence; source priority breaks ties, then the freshest observation. Ambiguous identities are never silently merged.

Trust is the average confidence of the chosen values, less 0.35 points for each percent of fields where sources disagree. With no observations there is no score.

Inspect field provenance →
Identity review

Decisions requiring attention

Import Source record Reason Confidence Actions
No ambiguous identities require review.